This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Multi-diffusion-time diffusion-weighted MRI can probe tissue microstructure, but the method has not been widely applied to the microvasculature. At long diffusion-times, blood flow in capillaries is in the diffusive regime, and signal attenuation is dependent on blood velocity ([Formula: see text]) and capillary segment length ([Formula: see text]). It is described by the pseudo-diffusion coefficient ([Formula: see text]) of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM). At shorter diffusion-times, blood flow is in the ballistic regime, and signal attenuation depends on [Formula: see text], and not [Formula: see text]. In theory, [Formula: see text] could be estimated using [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. In this study, we compare the accuracy and repeatability of three approaches to estimating [Formula: see text], and therefore [Formula: see text]: the IVIM ballistic model, the velocity autocorrelation model, and the ballistic approximation to the velocity autocorrelation model. Twenty-nine rat datasets from two strains were acquired at 7 T, with [Formula: see text]-values between 0 and 1000 smm −2 and diffusion times between 11.6 and 50 ms. Five rats were scanned twice to assess scan-rescan repeatability. Measurements of [Formula: see text] were validated using corrosion casting and micro-CT imaging. The ballistic approximation of the velocity autocorrelation model had lowest bias relative to corrosion cast estimates of [Formula: see text], and had highest repeatability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scott et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: