Key result
NOACs demonstrated a similar risk of stroke and bleeding compared to warfarin in obese and non-obese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (SHR 1.09), but were associated with significantly better survival.
Why the study?
The efficacy and safety of NOACs are not well investigated in obese patients, and fixed dosing could lead to under-anticoagulation.
Does NOAC therapy improve survival and reduce stroke or bleeding compared to warfarin in morbidly obese and non-obese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=755)
No
Does NOAC therapy improve survival and reduce stroke or bleeding compared to warfarin in morbidly obese and non-obese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: SHR 1.09 (95% CI 0.79-1.51)
p-value: p=0.62
NOACs demonstrate a similar stroke and bleeding risk profile to warfarin in morbidly obese patients with non-valvular AF, but are associated with significantly better survival.
Supports similar stroke/bleeding risks with NOACs versus warfarin in obese NVAF; leaves open confirmation of survival benefit in randomized trials.
Background: The efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K-dependent anticoagulants (NOAC) are not well investigated in the obese population, and fixed dosing could lead to under-anticoagulation. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of obesity on anticoagulation outcomes and survival in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Methods: We enrolled 755 patients who required anticoagulation for AF from 2015 to 2016. We grouped the patients into four groups. Group 1 (n = 297) included patients with BMI< 40 kg/m2 treated with NOACs, Group 2 (n = 358) included patients on warfarin with BMI< 40 kg/m2, Group 3 (n = 57) had patients on NOACs with BMI≥ 40 kg/m2 and Group 4 (n = 43) included patients on warfarin and BMI≥ 40 kg/m2. Study outcomes were the composite endpoint of stroke, bleeding, and survival. Results: Competing risk regression showed that stroke and bleeding were not affected by obesity or treatment (SHR: 1.09 (95% CI: 0.79-1.51); P = 0.62). Older age was the predictor of stroke/bleeding (HR:1.03 (95% CI:1.01-1.06); P = 0.02). Predictors of mortality were heart failure (HR:2.23 (95% CI:1.25-3.97); P = 0.007), lower creatinine clearance (HR: 0.98 (95% CI:0.97-0.98): P < 0.001), non-obese patients on warfarin (HR:3.51 (95%CI:1.6-7.7): P = 0.002) and obese patients on warfarin (HR: 6.7 (95% CI:2.51-17.92); P < 0.001). Conclusion: NOACs could have a similar risk profile to warfarin in obese and non-obese patients with non-valvular AF but could have better survival. Larger randomized trials are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albabtain et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=755). Non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Composite of stroke and bleeding (SHR 1.09, 95% CI 0.79-1.51, p=0.62). NOACs demonstrated a similar risk of stroke and bleeding compared to warfarin in obese and non-obese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (SHR 1.09), but were associated with significantly better survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: