The study examines chemiluminescence measurements and computations as a method of validation. Because chemiluminescent radicals are present in small concentrations and associated timescales are also small, a common assumption is that these are quasi-steady-state species and their transport can be ignored. This paper examines the above assumption using available data and simulation results, specifically aiming at a single element rocket combustor under strong pressure fluctuations. Variations in the kinetics rate constants are considered for assessing sensitivity of the results. Two additional aspects are explored: the ability of the excited species to represent the chemical heat release and the optical thickness of the medium. For the conditions of the study, the quasi-steady-state assumption in the case of OH* is found to be marginally insufficient while in the case of CH*, it is found to be acceptable. Modeled heat release is qualitatively better captured by CH* than OH* because of higher difference in the peak to asymptotic concentrations and lower ground state concentration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sardeshmukh et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: