Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a Monte Carlo comparison of the small-sample performance of subsample ordinary least squares, the Heckman-Lee two-stage estimator, and the robust estimator of Lee. Each estimator is considered under bivariate normal, t, and chi-square error structures. The estimates indicate that the Heckman-Lee and Lee estimators do not provide an unequivocal mean square error improvement upon subsample ordinary least squares in small samples. While effectively controlling for selectivity bias, the two-stage estimators suffer a substantial loss of small-sample precision relative to subsample ordinary least squares.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zuehlke et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: