Key result
Clarifying clinical indications for troponin testing and discouraging 'tick box' practices led to a measurable improvement in the appropriateness of test requests.
Why the study?
Does clarifying clinical indications and discouraging tick-box practices improve the appropriateness of troponin requests?
Observational
No
Does clarifying clinical indications and discouraging tick-box practices improve the appropriateness of troponin requests?
Clarifying clinical indications and discouraging automated tick-box requests can significantly improve the appropriate use of troponin testing in acute hospital settings.
Supports implementing indication-based protocols to reduce unnecessary troponin testing; confirms RCT efficacy of targeted education for lab stewardship.
Acute myocardial infarction (ACS) is one of the most common presentations in acute hospital settings. Troponin (cTn) has emerged as one of the most sensitive biochemical markers for the diagnosis of ACS. However, if used inappropriately and in the absence of true clinical context then it can be elevated in a number of non cardiac conditions and lead to false clinical diagnosis, inappropriate workup, and increased patient stay in hospital. The cost of unnecessary clinical testing is another aspect of the problem. At Royal Gwent Hospital in Newport (one of the busiest district general hospitals in Wales) we retrospectively analysed the nature of troponin requests over a random period of one week, specifically looking for the indications and final diagnostic impact. In many cases it was found that requests were made without any clinical justification. One of the main and probably unavoidable reasons for this was that requests were made from triage before patient was assessed by a clinician. However, steps were taken to clarify common clinical indications for suspected cardiac diagnosis in which troponin was useful. Additionally, the "tick box" practice for inappropriate laboratory investigations was discouraged. A repeat audit was done on similar basic principles and a measurable improvement was identified, with a potential for significant impact in future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Syed Anjum Gardezi (2015) conducted an observational in Suspected acute myocardial infarction. Clarification of clinical indications for troponin testing vs. Pre-intervention practice was evaluated on Appropriateness of troponin requests and final diagnostic impact. Clarifying clinical indications for troponin testing and discouraging 'tick box' practices led to a measurable improvement in the appropriateness of test requests.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: