Key result
TMVI linked to a ~53% increase in submaximal exercise capacity, especially with RVF recovery.
Why the study?
While TMVI improves outcomes in severe mitral regurgitation, the impact of right ventricular function on exercise capacity in these patients is less well understood.
Does transcatheter mitral valve intervention improve submaximal exercise capacity and right ventricular function in patients with severe mitral regurgitation?
Cohort (n=28)
Does transcatheter mitral valve intervention improve submaximal exercise capacity and right ventricular function in patients with severe mitral regurgitation?
TMVI significantly improves submaximal exercise capacity in patients with severe mitral regurgitation, particularly in those who experience concurrent improvements in right ventricular function.
Transcatheter mitral valve interventions (TMVI) has been proven to reduce symptom burden and improve outcome in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). However, the impact of right ventricular function (RVF) on exercise capacity in MR patients is less well understood. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the most comprehensive approach to assess maximum exercise capacity. Submaximal exercise capacity (SEC), assessed by constant work rate exercise time testing (CWRET), is presumed to be relevant in daily life activities, and gives a more differentiated physiological insight into the nature of exercise intolerance. Thus, 28 MR patients underwent CPET and CWRET (at 75% of maximum work rate in the initial incremental exercise test) prior to TMVI and 3-months post-procedurally. Patients´ mean age was 75.0±8.7 years and 32.1% were female. One patient presented with a MR reduction of less than 2 grades. RVF was at least moderately impaired in 25% of the patients. SEC of these patients was lower, but did not significantly differ (416.4s±359.6 vs. 296.1±216.5s; p=) from patients without RVF-deterioration. At follow up, the SEC improved significantly (from 337.4±262.2s to 517.4±393.5s; p=0.006). Maximum oxygen uptake (peakVO 2 ) showed a positive trend, but no statistically significant difference (10.3±3.1ml/min/kg vs. 11.3±3.4ml/min/kg; p=0.06). RVF improved in 35.7% of the patients and these patients showed a significantly higher SEC increase (471.7±153.9s vs. 82.7±47.0s, p=0.003). SEC is significantly increased in MR patients undergoing TMVI, reflecting an improvement especially regarding daily life activities. This may be related to TMVI´s beneficial effect on right ventricular remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerçek et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Mitral regurgitation (n=28). Transcatheter mitral valve intervention (TMVI) vs. Baseline (pre-TMVI) was evaluated on Submaximal exercise capacity (SEC) assessed by constant work rate exercise time testing (p=0.006). Transcatheter mitral valve intervention significantly increased submaximal exercise capacity from 337.4s to 517.4s (p=0.006) at 3 months, with greater improvements in patients showing RVF recovery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Mitral valve interventionMore from Hellenic Journal of Cardiology