Key result
Infusion of GLP-1 (9-36) or Ex-4 protected isolated rat hearts against ischemia-reperfusion injury (p > 0.01), whereas GLP-1, NLT, and Ex-4 (9-39) showed no protection.
Why the study?
GLP-1 has potential beyond T2DM but is rapidly degraded, prompting investigation of the cardioprotective actions of various GLP-1 receptor ligands against ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Do GLP-1 receptor ligands improve hemodynamics and reduce infarct size in isolated rat hearts subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury?
Do GLP-1 receptor ligands improve hemodynamics and reduce infarct size in isolated rat hearts subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury?
Exendin-4 and GLP-1 (9-36) protect the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury, with Ex-4 acting via the GLP-1 receptor and GLP-1 (9-36) acting independently of it.
Does not support clinical use of GLP-1 ligands for cardioprotection; leaves open translation from rat models to human ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Tirzepatide is a dual glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonist and a promising therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). GLP-1 is an incretin hormone with therapeutic potential beyond type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, GLP-1 is rapidly degraded by dipeptdyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) to GLP-1 (9-36). Exendin-4 (Ex-4) is a DPP-IV-resistant GLP-1 receptor agonist which, when truncated to Ex-4 (9-39), acts as a GLP-1 receptor antagonist. In the present study, hearts isolated from Wistar rats (n = 8 per group) were perfused with a modified Langendorff preparation. Left ventricular (LV) contractility and cardiovascular hemodynamics were evaluated by a data acquisition program and infarct size was evaluated by 2,3,5-Triphenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining and cardiac enzyme levels. Hearts were subjected to 30 min regional ischemia, produced by ligation of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery followed by 30 min reperfusion. Hearts were treated during reperfusion with either the non-lipidated precursor of tirzepatide (NLT), GLP-1, GLP-1 (9-36), or Ex-4 in the presence or absence of Ex-4 (9-39). Infusion of GLP-1 (9-36) or Ex-4 protected the heart against I/R injury (p > 0.01) by normalizing cardiac hemodynamic and enzyme levels. Neither GLP-1, NLT, nor Ex-4 (9-39) showed any protection. Interestingly, Ex-4 (9-39) blocked Ex-4-mediated protection but not that of GLP-1 (9-36). These data suggest that Ex-4-mediated protection is GLP-1-receptor-dependent but GLP-1 (9-36)-mediated protection is not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismaeil et al. (2022) studied Ischemia reperfusion injury. GLP-1 receptor ligands (GLP-1 (9-36), Ex-4, NLT, GLP-1) vs. Ex-4 (9-39) or untreated was evaluated on Protection against ischemia reperfusion injury (LV contractility, hemodynamics, infarct size, and cardiac enzymes) (p=> 0.01). Infusion of GLP-1 (9-36) or Ex-4 protected isolated rat hearts against ischemia-reperfusion injury (p > 0.01), whereas GLP-1, NLT, and Ex-4 (9-39) showed no protection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: