Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals SARIFA status impacts survival in colorectal cancer, indicating its potential as a prognostic marker.
Background SARIFA (Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas), defined as the direct contact between a tumour cell cluster and adipose cells at the invasion margin, has been proposed as a prognostic marker in gastrointestinal cancers. We hypothesized that SARIFA is associated with an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. Methods SARIFA status was evaluated in two large colorectal cancer cohorts ( N = 1876). Survival analyses were performed using multivariable Cox regression. Immune cell densities were analysed utilizing multiplex and conventional immunohistochemistry combined with digital image analysis. Results SARIFA-positivity was independently associated with a shorter cancer-specific survival in both cohorts [Cohort 1: hazard ratio (HR) for SARIFA-positive (vs. negative) 1.75 (95% CI 1.35–2.25), P < 0.0001; Cohort 2: HR for SARIFA-positive (vs. negative) 2.09 (95% CI 1.43–3.05), P = 0.0001]. SARIFA-positivity was associated with lower densities of CD3 + T cells, CD66b + granulocytes, M1-like macrophages, and CD14 + HLA-DR + mature monocytic cells, but higher densities of M2-like macrophages and CD14 + HLA-DR - immature monocytic cells. Mean Cohen’s kappa for SARIFA evaluation between eight investigators was 0.80. Conclusions SARIFA status is a highly reproducible, independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. SARIFA-positivity is associated with lower densities of antitumourigenic immune cells and the polarisation of macrophages towards a protumourigenic M2-like phenotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tapiainen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: