OBJECTIVE: A debate remains regarding whether parents should teach their children harm-reduction tips for using alcohol while in college or whether they should maintain a zero-tolerance policy. Which type of alcohol-related communication parents should endorse is not empirically clear. The current study made use of a longitudinal measurement-burst design to examine this issue. METHOD: The sample consisted of 585 second-year students from a large university in the northeastern United States. Participants completed a baseline survey and 14 daily web-based surveys. Students were assessed for perceptions of parental alcohol-related messages and their own alcohol use. Multilevel models were estimated using HLM 6.04. RESULTS: The data indicate that zero-tolerance messages appeared most protective against alcohol use and consequences. Harm-reduction messages were most risky, even when compared with mixed messages or the absence of a message. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that a zero-tolerance approach was associated with safer outcomes than other messages, even if students were already using alcohol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abar et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: