This research develops a quantitative test for anecdotal, qualitative claims that, relative to more traditional institutes of higher education, for-profit colleges and universities engage in systemic grade-inflation to retain students who may not be academically viable. This research used the National Center for Education Statistic’s Beginning Postsecondary Survey 2003/2009 Longitudinal Study (BPS) to test this claim by examining the correlation between indicators of academic preparedness and college academic performance for students at for-profit versus nonprofit/public universities for students pursuing an associate’s degree and bachelor’s degree, respectively. Findings demonstrate many pre-college indicators of academic preparedness, such as high school GPA, SAT score, and demographic risk factors, were strong predictors of success in higher education for students that attended a nonprofit/public institution, while the same indicators had little or no predictive power among students at for-profit colleges or universities. These findings provide evidence that for-profit institutions actively engage in grade inflation relative to more traditional institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baird et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: