Traditional definitions of professionalism emphasize criteria such as collective control over entry into the profession, an ethical code supported by self-policing, a special set of skills and a definable body of knowledge, as well as client relations with the public. By such definitions the occupational role of journalists does not qualify as professional. An analysis of well-established professions such as the clergy and medicine does, however, reveal that current definitions of professionalism do not recognize the sacred aspect of a vital service rendered by a profession. Taking this into account, the role of the journalist might qualify as professional in spite of falling short on some traditional criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thorbjørn Broddason (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: