California's 27 offshore oil and gas platforms will reach the end of their useful lifetimes sometime in the near future and will require decommissioning. Although existing leases require complete removal of all platforms and associated infrastructure, the underlying laws and regulations have changed in recent years to allow a number of alternative uses after decommissioning. In particular, AB 2503, signed into law in September 2010, provides for a rigs-to-reefs program that allows the state to accept ownership of decommissioned platforms in federal waters. Decisions about whether to remove platforms completely or leave them in place as artificial reefs will depend in part on the relative cost of the 2 options. In this study, we describe the design and use of a mathematical decision model that provides detailed cost estimates of complete and partial removal (to 85 feet below the water line) for California's offshore platforms. The model, PLATFORM, is loaded with Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) costs for complete removal, along with costs for partial removal calculated for this study and estimates of the uncertainty associated with decommissioning cost estimates. PLATFORM allows users to define a wide range of decommissioning and costing scenarios (e.g., number of platforms, choice of heavy lift vessel, shell mound removal, reef enhancement). As a benchmark cost, complete removal of all 27 offshore platforms, grouped into the 7 decommissioning projects defined by the most recent federal cost estimates produced in 2010, would cost an estimated $1.09 billion, whereas partial removal of these platforms, grouped into the same set of projects, would cost $478 million, with avoided costs of $616 million (with minor rounding). Integr Environ Assess Manag 2015;X:000–000. © 2015 SETAC Key Points PLATFORM is an interactive decision model that uses options and suboptions to calculate oil and gas platform decommissioning costs, for complete and partial decommissioning scenarios. PLATFORM allows users to explore a wide range of decommissioning and costing scenarios, as well as providing preprogrammed features that allow detailed examination of how uncertainty may affect analysis results. Using PLATFORM, complete removal of all 27 offshore platforms as proposed would cost an estimated $1.09 billion, while partial removal of these platforms would cost $478 million, with avoided costs of about $616 million. Using PLATFORM to estimate costs for 3 illustrative scenarios, the cost savings of the partial removal option for decommissioning was found to be substantial for larger platforms when compared to complete removal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bressler et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: