Clinical usefulness of Anti-ganglioside antibody in children with neurologic disease: single center study Purpose: Ganglioside antibodies are known to be related to central nervous system diseases such as Gullain-Barre syndrome, and Miller-Fisher syndrome or other illnesses with neurologic symptoms like motor weakness, ataxia, changed mental status, diplopia, and dizziness. In this study the utility of anti-ganglioside antibody titer as a diagnostic marker and its correlation with clinical course in pediatric patients were investigated. Methods: From October 2010 to Apirl 2016, anti-ganglioside antibody panel was performed in 42 patients with one of these symptoms: ataxia, motor weakness, changed mental status, diplopia. The panel was composed of 6 subtypes of antiganglioside antibodies: Anti-GM1 IgG/IgM, Anti-GD1b IgG/IgM, Anti-GQ1b IgG/ IgM. The results were compared with other aspects of clinical diagnostic studies including Brain magnetic resonance imaging(MRI), electroencephalogram(EEG), cerebrospinal fluid examination and routine laboratory work-up Results: Among 42 patients, total 11 patients showed positivity on antiganglioside antibody. Among anti-ganglioside antibody positive patients, brainstem encephalitis were the most common followed by Gullain-Barre syndrome, acute opthalmoplegia without ataxia, acute disseminated encephalitis, encephalitis and Tolosa-Hunt syndrome. Subtypes of ganglioside antibodies are investigated in each diseases, but not like previous datas, subtypes were varied case by case in same disease, showing lack of correlation. Conclusion: Anti-ganglioside antibody panel exam was useful in diagnosing brainstem encephalitis and several other neurologic illnesses with cerebellar symptoms. Also, unlike previously known adult data, positivity of anti-ganglioside antibodies in GBS was relatively low in children (20%). However, further study might be done to clarify connections between antiganglioside antibodies titer and the clinical course of the diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
송지호 et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: