Why the study?
Amiodarone and propafenone are the most widely used drugs in Egypt for the pharmacological cardioversion of AF, but their relative efficacy and rapidity needed comparison.
Does oral propafenone improve the rapidity of conversion to sinus rhythm compared to intravenous amiodarone in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation?
Does oral propafenone improve the rapidity of conversion to sinus rhythm compared to intravenous amiodarone in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation?
Oral propafenone provides significantly faster pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation compared to intravenous amiodarone, with similar overall efficacy.
May favor oral propafenone for faster cardioversion in recent-onset AF; extends RCT evidence on speed versus IV amiodarone.
AimThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and rapidity of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) conversion by oral propafenone versus an intravenous infusion of amiodarone.BackgroundAmiodarone and propafenone are the most widely used drugs in Egypt for the pharmacological cardioversion of AF.Patients and methodsFifty patients with recent-onset AF – within less than 48 h – were investigated. The patients were divided randomly into two groups: the first group (group A) included 25 patients in whom amiodarone was administered and the second group (group B) included 25 patients in whom propafenone was administered.Results88% of patients in group A were converted successfully into sinus rhythm compared with 84% of patients in group B (receiving propafenone). The time elapsed between the onset of drug administration to conversion of AF into sinus rhythm in group A was 9 h: 7 min ± 5 h: 04 min, whereas that of group B was 3 h: 9 min ± 1 h: 54 min, with P value 0.001 (highly significant).ConclusionIntravenous infusion of amiodarone as well as oral propafonone can be used successfully in cardioversion of AF into sinus rhythm. Intravenous infusions of amiodarone and oral propafonone are not only highly effective but also well-tolerated drugs in the management of recent-onset AF. Time needed for conversion of AF into sinus rhythm using oral propafenone is significantly shorter than that needed by amiodarone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamil et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: