Why the study?
Does classic bileaflet mitral valve prolapse cause left ventricular enlargement in the absence of significant mitral regurgitation?
Does classic bileaflet mitral valve prolapse cause left ventricular enlargement in the absence of significant mitral regurgitation?
Classic bileaflet mitral valve prolapse is associated with left ventricular enlargement even without significant mitral regurgitation, suggesting a primary structural or myocardial effect independent of volume overload.
LV enlargement may occur in bileaflet MVP without significant MR; hypothesis-generating for primary myocardial effect, needs prospective validation.
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether left ventricular size was increased in patients with classic bileaflet mitral valve prolapse (MVP) in the absence of significant mitral regurgitation (MR). METHOD: Patients with classic bileaflet MVP were included as the case group. Two different control groups were established. The first control group was composed of the patients with mild MR caused by the reasons except MVP. The second control group consisted of healthy individuals whose echocardiograms were normal. The patients with moderate or severe MR and having abnormality in the other valves were excluded. RESULTS: There were 20 patients in each group. Systolic and diastolic diameters and volumes of left ventricle (LV) in the MVP group were significantly higher than those in the control groups. In 10 of the patients in the MVP group, LV internal diastolic diameter (LVIDD) values were measured as ≥5.7 cm, whereas increased LVIDD value was detected in only one patient in the other two control groups. There was a significant difference in terms of the presence of increased LVIDD values between the MVP group and the control groups. Despite this enlargement in the LV dimension, the LV ejection fractions were found similar in all groups. Furthermore, it was found that the lengths of both anterior and posterior mitral leaflets in MVP group were significantly higher than those in the control groups. CONCLUSION: The LV diameters and volumes of patients with classic bileaflet MVP were found to be increased even in the absence of significant MR. These results need to be supported by large-scale clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yiğiner et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: