PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2004Biostatistics136 citationsOpen Access

Factorial and time course designs for cDNA microarray experiments

View Full Paper
GGGary GlonekNeuroSurgical Research FoundationPSP. J. SolomonThe University of Adelaide

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Microarrays are powerful tools for surveying the expression levels of many thousands of genes simultaneously. They belong to the new genomics technologies which have important applications in the biological, agricultural and pharmaceutical sciences. There are myriad sources of uncertainty in microarray experiments, and rigorous experimental design is essential for fully realizing the potential of these valuable resources. Two questions frequently asked by biologists on the brink of conducting cDNA or two-colour, spotted microarray experiments are 'Which mRNA samples should be competitively hybridized together on the same slide?' and 'How many times should each slide be replicated?' Early experience has shown that whilst the field of classical experimental design has much to offer this emerging multi-disciplinary area, new approaches which accommodate features specific to the microarray context are needed. In this paper, we propose optimal designs for factorial and time course experiments, which are special designs arising quite frequently in microarray experimentation. Our criterion for optimality is statistical efficiency based on a new notion of admissible designs; our approach enables efficient designs to be selected subject to the information available on the effects of most interest to biologists, the number of arrays available for the experiment, and other resource or practical constraints, including limitations on the amount of mRNA probe. We show that our designs are superior to both the popular reference designs, which are highly inefficient, and to designs incorporating all possible direct pairwise comparisons. Moreover, our proposed designs represent a substantial practical improvement over classical experimental designs which work in terms of standard interactions and main effects. The latter do not provide a basis for meaningful inference on the effects of most interest to biologists, nor make the most efficient use of valuable and limited resources.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Glonek et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bc6a55b8f4ede65a901cahttps://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/5.1.89
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays2002 · 1,062 citations
  2. 2Linear Models1971 · 3,239 citations
  3. 3Design and analysis of comparative microarray experiments2003 · 67 citations
  4. 4Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation2002 · 3,500 citations
  5. 5[12] DNA arrays for analysis of gene expression1999 · 1,041 citations