BACKGROUND: Appendiceal cancer is a rare disease that has proven difficult to study in prospectively. Our initial report of this trial showed minor hematologic toxicity with both mitomycin C and oxaliplatin and similar 3-year survival. We now report an update of the first prospective randomized trial for appendiceal cancer with 10-year follow up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ) or mitomycin C (40 mg). Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated at 10 years and compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included in the study. The patients were 57% female, with a mean age of 55.3 years (range 22-82 years). The disease was low grade in 71% and high grade in 29%. The average peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score was 18 (SD 10) in the mitomycin C group and 17.9 (SD 9.4) in the oxaliplatin group (p = 0.94). The 10-year survival rate was 56.2% (SE 7.2) with mitomycin C and 47.5% (SE 8.4) with oxaliplatin, p = 0.83. The 10-year progression-free survival rate in the mitomycin C group was 45.2% (SE 8.4) compared with 50.4% (SE 6.7) in the oxaliplatin group, p = 0.95. Median survival was 9.1 years after HIPEC with oxaliplatin, and median not reached for the mitomycin C group (> 5.6 years). CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin and mitomycin C have similar long-term efficacy for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with appendiceal neoplasms and peritoneal dissemination. Long-term survival is experienced by most patients after cytoreduction surgery (CRS) and HIPEC for appendiceal neoplasms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levine et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: