BACKGROUND: While Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is frequently associated with impulsivity, its structural brain substrates are still poorly defined. The triadic model of addiction postulates that impulsive behavior is regulated by an amygdalo-striatal impulsive subcomponent, a prefrontal and cerebellar reflective subcomponent, and an insular regulatory subcomponent. The objective of this study was thus to examine the relationships between self-evaluated impulsivity and structural brain abnormalities in patients with severe AUD (sAUD) using the triadic model as a theoretical framework. METHODS: Twenty-two inpatients with sAUD and 17 Healthy Controls (HC) completed two impulsivity scales: the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11), and the Urgency, Premeditation, Perseverance, Sensation Seeking, Positive Urgency Impulsive Behavior Scale (UPPS). They also underwent an anatomical MRI. The brain volumes of the regions described as involved in the three subcomponents of the triadic model were extracted. RESULTS: The two groups did not significantly differ on self-reported impulsivity measures. However, the volumes of the caudate nuclei, executive cerebellum and insula were smaller in sAUD than in HC. In the sAUD group there were significant positive correlations between certain impulsivity measures and gray matter volume of the nucleus accumbens. CONCLUSIONS: In sAUD, self-evaluated impulsivity specifically relates to the integrity of the ventral striatum that belongs to the impulsive subcomponent of the triadic neurocognitive model of addiction. It is not related to the integrity or deterioration of the brain regions that underlie the reflexive or regulatory sub-component. Although these results have methodological limitations, they are consistent with the impulsive/compulsive model of addiction and confirms the persistence of the relationship between impulsivity and ventral striatum in sAUD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabé et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: