Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Privacy preservation over directed graphs remains poorly understood: asymmetry breaks reciprocity, invalidates extensions from undirected settings, and alters what an adversary can infer from message exchanges. Using average consensus as a canonical case, we (i) present an information-theoretic analysis that establishes a lower bound on unavoidable leakage for any exactly accurate protocol, and (ii) propose a new algorithm that achieves this bound while preserving exact accuracy. Formally, within an ideal-world secure multiparty computation framework, we prove that any exactly accurate protocol inevitably reveals, to an honest-but-curious adversary, the partial sums of the honest connected components that remain after corrupt nodes are removed. Guided by this insight, we propose a secret-sharing-based scheme that integrates seamlessly with any consensus algorithm and achieves the privacy bound without compromising accuracy. Experimental simulations consolidate our theoretical results: the proposed method attains the privacy bound, converges to the exact average, and outperforms prior approaches in terms of both privacy and accuracy.
Yu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: