Many clinicians and other mental health professionals have difficulty in evaluating and fully comprehending the research literature relevant to their practice. This paper focuses on simple but powerful misunderstandings often attributed to the mainstay of research—significance-testing methodology. The limitations of the method are examined as a means toward better understanding of the contribution empirical research can make to clinical knowledge and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim Reakes Smith (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: