Why the study?
Early detection of cardiovascular anomalies is critical for proactive patient care, requiring methods to predict cardiac events across heterogeneous IoMT silos without centralized data sharing.
Does Federated Learning improve the classification performance of early cardiac event prediction (PVC) using ECG signals compared to independent local models?
Does Federated Learning improve the classification performance of early cardiac event prediction (PVC) using ECG signals compared to independent local models?
Federated learning improves the accuracy of early cardiac anomaly prediction (such as PVC) across diverse ECG datasets while preserving data privacy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports federated ECG modeling without data sharing; leaves open whether gains improve clinical outcomes.
Early detection of cardiovascular anomalies remains critical for proactive patient care, especially within the growing ecosystem of Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) devices. This study explores the application of Federated Learning (FL) to predict early cardiac events using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals across heterogeneous IoMT silos without centralized data sharing. We focus on Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC) as an example of early event prediction. Using three realworld ECG datasets (PTB-XL, Chapman-Shaoxing, and MITBIH), we simulate cross-silo environments where local models are trained independently and aggregated through FL. Our experiments demonstrate that local models can already achieve high classification performance, but global models obtained via FL lead to consistent improvements in macro precision, recall, and F1-scores across datasets. Visual analysis of early ECG segments further highlights inter-dataset variability, emphasizing the importance of silo-specific characteristics. The results validate that FL is a promising strategy to enable scalable, privacypreserving, and accurate early cardiovascular event prediction in IoMT systems, bridging clinical silos while safeguarding sensitive patient data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Georgiades et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: