PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026Biosensors and Bioelectronics2 citationsOpen Access

A Widely Used CRP Aptamer Does Not Bind CRP, Revealing a General Route to Surface-Driven Pseudoaffinity in Biosensors

View Full Paper
QLQuan Duc LeALAn Thi Hoai LeTWTong Ye Wang

Key Points

  • To investigate the binding activity of a widely used CRP aptamer and the implications of pseudoaffinity in biosensor applications.
  • Re-examination of a reported DNA sequence by two orthogonal solution-phase methods and surface plasmon resonance (SPR).
  • Comparison of binding activity to native CRP and streptavidin-coated surfaces.
  • Assessment of binding under lower-background capture conditions.
  • No detectable binding of CRP to the reported aptamer in solution-phase assays.
  • Strong binding of CRP to sensor surfaces without the aptamer, indicating pseudoaffinity.
  • Findings suggest that previously reported affinities are misleading and stem from surface-driven effects rather than true molecular recognition.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aptamer sequences are often reused in biosensors and diagnostics without independent confirmation of binding activity, even though rigorous validation requires quantitative solution-phase testing by orthogonal methods. Here, we re-examined a DNA sequence reported in 2010 to bind C-reactive protein (CRP) with a K d of 3.5 nM by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and subsequently adopted in many CRP aptasensor studies. We tested this sequence by two orthogonal solution-phase methods and by SPR. In solution-phase assays, we found no detectable binding of the reported aptamer to native CRP. In SPR, we found that CRP binds strongly to streptavidin-containing sensor surfaces even in the absence of immobilized DNA, whereas the reported sequence produced no measurable ligand-specific SPR response under lower-background capture conditions. Thus, the originally reported affinity is best explained by surface-driven pseudoaffinity rather than true aptamer-CRP recognition. More broadly, this case does not merely add another example of aptamer nonbinding, but reveals a general route by which nonbinding aptamers can acquire apparent affinity through surface-driven pseudoaffinity and then be propagated through the biosensor literature as validated molecular recognition reagents. This study underscores the need for orthogonal solution-phase validation before aptamers are reused in biosensor development and related analytical applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Le et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd0155783ba022b6fbe7dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2026.118875
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper