PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026Spatial Statistics1 citationsOpen Access

Bayesian local influence analysis for the spatial autoregressive combined model

View Full Paper
YLYonghui LiuUniversity of CanberraSYSai YanShanghai International Studies UniversityTCTianyifeng ChuShanghai International Studies University

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a unified Bayesian local influence diagnostic framework for the spatial autoregressive combined model.
  • Three perturbation schemes: variance, dependent variable, and explanatory variables.
  • Two diagnostic measures based on Kullback–Leibler divergence and Bayes factors.
  • Implementation via Gibbs sampling, compatible with Stan and MATLAB Econometrics Toolbox.
  • The framework successfully detects influential observations in spatial datasets.
  • Analytical measures yield enhanced inferential reliability, especially under heteroskedastic errors.
  • Simulation studies validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Abstract

This paper develops a Bayesian local influence diagnostic framework for the spatial autoregressive combined (SAC) model, addressing an underexplored area in Bayesian spatial econometrics. While Bayesian influence analysis and MCMC methods are well established, a unified framework for local influence diagnostics in SAC models—capturing both spatial lag and spatial error dependence—has not been previously developed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to construct a coherent Bayesian local influence framework for the SAC model. We propose three perturbation schemes (variance, dependent variable, and explanatory variables) and derive two complementary diagnostic measures based on Kullback–Leibler divergence and Bayes factors. The corresponding influence measures are obtained analytically, and the framework accommodates heteroskedastic errors, enhancing robustness. Computation is implemented via Gibbs sampling and is compatible with software such as Stan and the MATLAB Econometrics Toolbox. The proposed approach is illustrated through simulation studies and two benchmark spatial datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in detecting influential observations and improving inferential reliability. Overall, the framework provides a novel and unified Bayesian diagnostic tool for SAC models in applied spatial econometrics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd0155783ba022b6fbf93https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2026.101001
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bayesian Local Influence in Growth Curve Model with Unstructured Covariance1999 · 9 citations
  2. 2Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review2007 · 3,447 citations
  3. 3Criticism and Influence Analysis in Regression1982 · 169 citations
  4. 4Model uncertainty in cross‐country growth regressions2001 · 913 citations
  5. 5Bayesian local influence analysis of skew-normal spatial dynamic panel data models2018 · 17 citations