Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The primary objective of this paper is to evaluate the claim that participation in adversarial adjudication and divorce mediation is an appropriate option for low and high conflict couples respectively. Defining conflict in a way that conflates conflict with indicators of different type of violence is a major reason for not supporting this claim because it negates the possibility of assessing the intensity of conflict (low/high) independently of its indicators. In addition to content subsumed under Definition, evidence and argument presented under four other subheadings do not support the claim. The paper ends with a segment sub-headed Conclusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desmond Ellis (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: