Key result
Review identifies key vascular, metabolic, and neuroendocrine markers of early subclinical cardiometabolic dysfunction in young adults.
Highlights the importance of subclinical indicators and sex differences in young adults to advance early detection and prevention of cardiometabolic disease.
Cardiometabolic disease develops over decades, yet most research emphasizes markers of disease risk in those with established disease or focuses primarily on traditional risk factors (e.g., low-density lipoprotein, fasted blood glucose). Meanwhile, indicators of early cardiometabolic dysfunction in young adults are not well-characterized but are crucial for advancing early detection and prevention efforts. The present review addresses this gap in the literature by providing a synthesis of subclinical indicators of early cardiometabolic dysfunction in young adults, including pathophysiologic vascular/endothelial, metabolic, inflammatory, and neuroendocrine indicators, as well as newly emerging targets. Importantly, it is well-established that cardiometabolic risk and disease differ by biological sex. This review also incorporates sex-specific considerations where possible to address this difference. This review summarizes the available literature regarding subclinical indicators of early cardiometabolic dysfunction, aiming to improve the mechanistic understanding of cardiometabolic disease pathogenesis and offer a novel conceptual framework to advance how researchers and clinicians approach early detection and prevention of cardiometabolic dysfunction and disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turner et al. (2026) conducted a review in Early cardiometabolic dysfunction. Subclinical indicators of early cardiometabolic dysfunction was evaluated. This review synthesizes subclinical indicators of early cardiometabolic dysfunction in young adults, highlighting vascular, metabolic, inflammatory, and neuroendocrine markers and sex differences.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: