Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced vector processing efficiency in heterogeneous architectures, suggesting a new model for PIM integration.
The growing demand for high-performance, energy-efficient execution of data-parallel workloads has driven the resurgence of vector processors, yet their expanding instruction sets exacerbate the area-performance trade-off of vector processing units (VPUs). Processing-in-memory (PIM) technique offers a promising path to mitigate this trade-off by offloading vector operations near data. However, integrating the computing-capable SRAM (C-SRAM) with conventional VPUs introduces significant architectural challenges, including inefficient coordination between heterogeneous devices, the lack of a unified hardware/software interface, and underutilized parallelism within the C-SRAM arrays due to unoptimized data handling. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a heterogeneous VPU (HVPU) that seamlessly integrates a standard VPU inside a vector processor with a C-SRAM for more efficient vector processing. HVPU introduces a standardized interface between the processor frontend and the C-SRAM, enabling instruction dispatch, dynamic hazard resolution, and concurrent execution. Furthermore, it employs multiple independent PIM blocks coupled with dual controlling pipelines inside the C-SRAM for further performance improvement. This design facilitates pipelined data loading and computing, effectively hiding memory latency and fully unlocking the parallel potential of C-SRAM. The system is supported by a user-friendly and generic programming model featuring a two-layer extended ISA system and a vector batch pipelining mechanism. Experimental results show that our HVPU-enhanced processor achieves significant speedups of 5.11× to 39.0× over the Xuantie-910 baseline on vector benchmarks, respectively, while reducing energy consumption by 75% on average. Meanwhile, it outperforms state-of-the-art PIM accelerators by 1.33× to 1.97× on the same benchmarks, with minimal area overhead. This demonstrates that our architectural co-design effectively alleviates the area-performance trade-off in vector processors and offers a scalable heterogeneous architecture template for efficient vector processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: