This repository contains the foundational documentation and mathematical framework for Aureonics v3, a constitutional AI governance framework that treats AI safety as a dynamical systems problem. Aureonics establishes unconditional mathematical stability guarantees for language models through the application of Lyapunov barrier functions on the probability simplex. Unlike traditional post-training alignment methods that lack formal proofs of robustness, Aureonics enforces constitutional safety constraints at inference time using a proprietary triadic architecture (C+R+S=1) representing Continuity, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty. Key Mathematical & Architectural Contributions: Unconditional Global Stability: Proof that the z-weighted Lyapunov barrier V_z ensures system stability under arbitrary adversarial pressure. Constitutional Brittleness Metric: Introduction of the B(xadv) metric, which reveals that single-pillar precision attacks approach maximum brittleness, whereas multi-pillar attacks are constitutionally weakest. Memory-Amplified Stabilisation: Architectural proof that system resistance increases proportional to attack duration, achieving up to 636x faster stabilisation compared to baseline. Cryptographic Auditability: Implementation of SHA-256 cryptographic receipts for every governed response, validating outputs against 20 international normative clauses (OECD, UNESCO, EU AI Act, UDHR, ICCPR, CETS 225). live @ www.lexaureon.com Empirical Validation: The framework, deployed as Lex Aureon, has been validated across 920 prompts spanning three independent, peer-reviewed safety benchmarks: HarmBench: 0.0% ASR (vs. 78.5% baseline). JailbreakBench (NeurIPS 2024): 0.0% ASR (vs. 4.0% baseline). AdvBench (Zou et al. 2023): 0.0% ASR (vs. 6.7% baseline).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emmanuel Omomehin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: