Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This Research Develops a Framework for Quantitative Equalities in Metric Spaces, Indicating New Insights in Algebra.
We develop a quantitative analogue of equational reasoning, which we call quantitative equational logic. The quantitative equations use, instead of classical equality, quantitative equalities, which are equalities indexed with nonnegative reals. Thus, s = ε t means that “ s and t are points in a metric space and their distance is less than ε”. Quantitative equalities will be used to encode behavioural distances, with ε being an upper bound on the measure of dissimilarity between two terms. We develop the metatheory of this subject. We define a notion of quantitative algebra, which is the quantitative analogue of universal algebra. We prove a completeness theorem for quantitative equational logic, and we show that we obtain monads on suitable categories of metric spaces. We present a set of examples where the free algebra of a quantitative equational theory corresponds to some well-known structure. These examples are: Hausdorff metrics from quantitative semilattices; p -Wasserstein metrics (hence also the Kantorovich metric), and the total variation metric.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bacci et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: