Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study optimizes structural parameters in VSM shafts, suggesting improved material efficiency.
The Vertical Shaft Machine (VSM) method is increasingly used in ultra-deep prefabricated shafts. However, as its application extends into hard ground, existing segment designs still largely follow soft soil experiences, resulting in insufficient material utilization and poor economic efficiency. Based on the first VSM shaft in South China, this study establishes a refined finite element model validated by field monitoring and subsequently constructs a structural response database. A GA-XGBoost surrogate model combined with the SHAP method quantifies the contributions of key parameters—concrete strength, rebar diameter, and steel plate thickness—to shaft structural stress. Following the optimization objective of reducing material consumption while maintaining the overall structural performance of the original design, an optimization scheme for Ring 0 reinforcement is proposed. Results show that SHAP analysis effectively identifies the contribution ranking of each parameter to the structural response: for Ring 0, concrete strength contributes the most while rebar diameter shows low sensitivity; for the cutting edge ring, steel plate thickness and concrete strength contribute significantly, whereas tie bars show the lowest sensitivity. After optimization of Ring 0, reinforcement consumption per linear meter of segment is reduced by 43.43 kg, and steel content decreases by 57.91 kg/m3. Verification confirms that the stress distribution remains largely unchanged and crack width meets specification limits. Tie bars in the cutting edge ring play an irreplaceable structural role during concrete pouring and should not be directly optimized. The proposed scheme reduces material consumption while ensuring structural safety, offering a reference for optimizing VSM shaft segment structures in hard ground conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: