Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey assesses awareness of preventive dentistry's economic value in dental professionals and the general population, suggesting a knowledge-application gap.
Background: A main concern in preventive dentistry is the lack of awareness of the importance of preventive oral health care and the economic influence of applying these measures when compared to seeking treatment only when needed. This study aimed to assess the level of awareness and knowledge of dental professionals and the general population regarding the economic value of preventive dentistry. Materials and Methods: A survey questionnaire was distributed to assess the respondents’ socioeconomic attributes, dental health knowledge, awareness of the cost of dental care services, and attitude toward preventive dental treatment. The level of knowledge was measured using an additive method, and the reliability of the variables was analyzed using Cronbach’s Alpha Model. The relationships of the variables were measured using the Chi-square test, independent t-test, and one-way analysis of variance with the Least Significant Difference test as post hoc analysis. Results: The knowledge scores with respect to education levels, types of residency, income, employment status, and involvement in the dental field were all found to have statistically significant differences. Those in high socioeconomic standing and those associated with the dental field agree that regular dental visits can save more money than visiting dentists only when needed. Conclusion: This study defined the relationship between the respondents’ socioeconomic status and their knowledge of the economic cost of preventive dentistry and their subsequent attitude toward it. The general population is well-informed on the economic value of preventive dentistry; however, the problem lies with the application of this knowledge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kayal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: