Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental trial evaluates shear capacity in novel beams, suggesting effective design recommendations.
This study presents an experimental and theoretical investigation on the shear behavior of a novel truss-type steel-reinforced recycled concrete short beam (TSRSB). Five TSRSB specimens with varying recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) replacement ratios ( r = 0%, 50%, 100%) and shear span-to-depth ratios ( λ = 0.76, 1.14, 1.52) were tested under concentrated loading to analyze their failure modes, load-displacement responses, and strain developments. The results indicate that reducing the shear span-to-depth ratio significantly enhances the shear capacity and initial stiffness; for instance, the ultimate load of the specimen with λ = 0.76 was 70.1% higher than that with λ = 1.52. In contrast, the RCA replacement ratio had a negligible impact on the ultimate load, with a maximum reduction of only 3.2%. A sophisticated finite element model was developed and validated against the experimental results, demonstrating high accuracy with a mean ratio of simulated-to-experimental ultimate load of 1.07. Based on the identified “truss-arch” mechanical model, a practical formula for predicting the shear capacity of TSRSB is proposed. This formula incorporates the influence of the RCA replacement ratio via a reduction factor ( α = 20/(20 + r )) and superposes the contributions of the recycled concrete, stirrups, vertical and diagonal web members of the truss, and the steel flanges. Within the tested parameter ranges ( r = 0 ~ 100%, λ = 0.52 ~ 1.14), the proposed formula shows good agreement with the experimental data, yielding a mean calculated-to-experimental shear capacity ratio of 1.00 with a coefficient of variation of 0.01. Therefore, the formula can provide a preliminary reference for the shear capacity calculation of specimens falling within these parameter ranges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: