Why the study?
Does training state or detraining affect ambulatory measures of cardiac autonomic control in vigorous exercisers compared to sedentary controls?
Does training state or detraining affect ambulatory measures of cardiac autonomic control in vigorous exercisers compared to sedentary controls?
Bradycardia in healthy regular exercisers is likely the result of a lower intrinsic heart rate rather than a shift in cardiac autonomic balance from sympathetic to vagal control.
Exercise bradycardia reflects lower intrinsic HR, not autonomic shifts; challenges vagal dominance assumptions and guides mechanistic research.
We examined the effect of training state on cardiac autonomic control in a naturalistic setting. Twenty-four vigorous exercisers were compared to age- and sex-matched sedentary controls. The regular exercisers were subjected to a 6-week training program after which they were randomized to 2 weeks of continued training or 2 weeks of detraining. Cardiac autonomic control was measured over a 24-h period by ambulatory recording, using the preejection period (PEP) and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). Nonexercising controls had a significantly higher ambulatory heart rate (HR) compared to the regular exercisers but comparable 24-h levels of PEP and RSA. In regular exercisers, 2 weeks of detraining did not significantly change the 24-h levels of HR, PEP, or RSA. We conclude that the bradycardia in healthy regular exercisers is the result of a lower intrinsic heart rate rather than a shift in cardiac autonomic balance from sympathetic to vagal control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goedhart et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: