Why the study?
Does a one-month interruption of training alter fitness and neurocardiologic parameters in top marathon skaters?
Does a one-month interruption of training alter fitness and neurocardiologic parameters in top marathon skaters?
A one-month interruption of training in elite marathon skaters leads to measurable detraining effects, including decreased maximal oxygen uptake and altered neurocardiologic parameters like reduced recumbent baroreflex sensitivity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Short training breaks may impair fitness and baroreflex sensitivity in elites; leaves open generalizability and clinical relevance.
The authors studied nine male Dutch top marathon skaters during a one-month interruption of their training schedules after their last contest in the winter. Before and after this period a maximal exercise test was done, and at days 0, 4, 7, 14 and 28 neurocardiologic measurement sessions-heart rate (HR) and noninvasive baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), recumbent and tilt-were done. Interruption of training resulted in a significant and relevant decrease in the maximal oxygen uptake (from 65.7/spl plusmn/5.8 to 61.6/spl plusmn/4.7 ml O/sub 2/.kg/sup -1/. min/sup -1/; P=0.03), most likely to be associated with decreased competitive possibilities. A modest increase in resting heart rate (from 54.6/spl plusmn/7.2 to 58.8/spl plusmn/7.5 bpm) became not significant. Heart rate during 60/spl deg/ tilt increased considerably (from 70.3/spl plusmn/6.1 to 80.1/spl plusmn/9.1 bpm; P=0.01), possibly due to a decrease in blood volume and an increase in cardiopulmonary baroreflex gain. Baroreflex sensitivity decreased in the recumbent (from 13.3/spl plusmn/5.4 to 9.8/spl plusmn/3.8 ms/mmHg, P=0.04), but not in the 60/spl deg/ tilt position (from 6.7/spl plusmn/2.0 to 6.0/spl plusmn/2.5 ms/mmHg). The meaning of these neurocardiologic changes for athletic performance is unclear. The authors' data show that detrimental changes in fitness, and neurocardiologic changes were measurable after a month of interruption of training, and will probably also be demonstrable in a larger group after 14 days.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frederiks et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: