PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Urban 3D Mesh Model Quality Using Three Photogrammetric Software Tools

PHparvin hasanteimouriAAAli AbdollahiMSMohamad Saadatseresht

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the quality of urban 3D models generated by different photogrammetric software tools.
  • Conducted a quality assessment on three software tools: Pix4D Mapper, Agisoft Metashape, and Itwin Capture Modeler.
  • Assessed models based on visual quality, geometric accuracy, length measurement accuracy, and internal consistency using identical datasets.
  • Analyzed results to compare software performance in urban modeling.
  • Itwin Capture Modeler demonstrated higher geometric precision and visual fidelity compared to Pix4D Mapper and Agisoft Metashape.
  • The findings indicate Itwin offers a more reliable option for professionals in urban modeling projects.

Abstract

Abstract. Urban 3D models play an increasingly significant role in various domains such as spatial analysis, urban planning, environmental monitoring, and the design and management of smart infrastructure. These models offer a detailed and realistic representation of urban environments, which aids decision-makers and urban developers in evaluating current conditions and predicting future development scenarios more effectively. Due to the growing number and diversity of photogrammetric and reality-capture software available in the market, ensuring the quality and reliability of the generated 3D models is of paramount importance. Precise quality evaluation—both geometrically and visually—is essential for selecting the most appropriate tool for urban applications.In this study, a comprehensive quality assessment was carried out based on four main categories: visual and radiometric quality control, absolute geometric accuracy, length measurement accuracy, and internal consistency (internal accuracy). The performance of three widely-used software tools Pix4D Mapper, Agisoft Metashape, and Itwin Capture Modeler was evaluated using identical input datasets. According to the analysis results, Itwin Capture Modeler outperformed the other two in terms of both geometric precision and visual fidelity. These findings suggest that Itwin is a more reliable and efficient option for professionals engaged in high-quality urban modeling projects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

hasanteimouri et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd12d5783ba022b6fcc35https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-x-4-w8-2025-331-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Experimental Verification of the Influence of the Quality of Input Images on the Processing of the Photogrammetric Model2025
  2. 2Evaluation of multi-camera images in different SfM-MVS based photogrammetric software and comparison of digital products in generating 3D city models2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3Development of a 3D City Model-Based System for Pre-Flight Evaluation and Optimization of Aerial Image Acquisition Plans2026
  4. 4Evaluation of open-source libraries and commercial software utilised for dense point cloud generation: a case study of cultural heritage objects2026
  5. 5Improving Urban Mapping Accuracy: Investigating the Role of Data Acquisition Methods and SfM Processing Modes in UAS-Based Survey Through Explainable AI Metrics2024 · 7 citations