Randomized trial demonstrates cost-effective fault diagnosis in machinery, suggesting improved maintenance efficiency.
Predictive Maintenance (PdM) in grinding processes is often constrained by the high cost of sensor infrastructures and the limited robustness of data-driven models in noisy industrial environments. This gap limits the effective adoption of advanced diagnostic techniques on the shop floor. This work presents a fault diagnosis framework based on a supervised autoencoder (SAE), designed for accurate and cost-effective industrial deployment using a reduced set of standard sensors. The approach integrates temporal segmentation, feature extraction, and a two-stage classification strategy for both fault detection and fault classification. The paper mages a comparison of SAE technique with other AI methods, making a detailed analysis of accuracy metrics. The main contributions are threefold: (i) the development of an SAE architecture capable of learning a highly discriminative latent representation of machine health; (ii) the demonstration that reliable diagnosis can be achieved using only two standard industrial sensors (force and acoustic emission), significantly reducing instrumentation requirements; and (iii) the introduction of an early fault detection strategy based on pre-contact data. Experimental validation on a bearing grinding machine dataset shows that the proposed method achieves accuracy above 92% with two sensors and up to 99.44% using only pre-contact signals. These results enable a zero-scrap strategy by allowing early process interruption before defective parts are produced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pascoschi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: