Retrospective analysis describes clinical features and MRI findings in pediatric patients with neurofibromatosis type 1, indicating screening potential.
Abstract Objective This study aimed to describe the clinical manifestations of pediatric patients (aged 0–18 years) with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) diagnosed at our hospital over a 13-year period. Material and methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients with NF1 who presented at Shenzhen Children's hospital between January 2012 and August 2025. Data were retrieved from the hospital's medical record system, including: demographics, clinical manifestations (cutaneous, neurological, and ophthalmologic), plexiform neurofibromas(PN), MRI findings, and NF1 genetic testing status. Results Three hundred and eighty-nine pediatric patients were reviewed. The median age at the time of diagnosis and the last follow-up was 6.1 years (IQR 3.2-9.3 years) and 6.7 years (IQR:4.3-10.5) respectively. The most frequent observed characteristics were CALMs (99.5%) and freckling (52.4%). PN was detected in 128 patients (32.9%); 57 received treatment. Whole-body MRI identified PN in 59/117 (50.4%), including 28/86 asymptomatic (32.6%). OPG was observed in 3 (0.8%). Seizures occurred in 11(2.8%). Lisch nodules were identified in 117 (30.1%). Orthopedic manifestations included scoliosis (48, 12.3%), other bone lesions (66, 17.0%), and pseudarthrosis (17, 4.4%). Conclusions The data in this report are largely in agreement with previously published series of children with NF1. WBMRI detected subclinical PN in 32.6% of asymptomatic patients, supporting its potential as a screening tool. Additionally, the prevalence of OPG in our Asian cohort was lower than previously reported in non-Asian populations, suggesting potential regional differences in the phenotypic spectrum of NF1. These findings warrant validation in larger, independent cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: