Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Article examines the interplay of geography and colonial ideologies in Benoit's L'Atlantide, revealing its complexities.
This article examines the entanglement of geography, literature, and colonial ideologythrough a reading of Pierre Benoit’s 1919 novel L’Atlantide. Following Edward Said’s Orientalism and scholarship on colonial cartography, it argues that geographical knowledge functions as a narrative weapon that supports imperial domination while simultaneously producing exoticized fictional imaginaries. L’Atlantide is thus analyzed as a paradigmatic example of what ‘colonial cosmopolitanism’ can represent both as fiction and as an idealized colonial model. Benoit’s novel, set in the Algerian Sahara, combines geographical realism with a mythical narrative centered on the lost city of Atlantis and its enigmatic queen, Antinéa. This setting enables the concept of a ‘good’ colonial cosmopolitanism with its perceived ‘bad’ pendant. While the French officers in the novel embody an idealized cosmopolitanism, Antinéa represents its threatening, non-European counterpart. Atlantis could therefore be seen as a “heterotopia” in Michel Foucault’s sense: a space that juxtaposes incompatible geographies, histories, and identities—and which, in its turn, reveals the deeper heterotopic nature of the colonial space itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sebastien; id_orcid 0000-0002-0127-4092 Doubinsky (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: