Key result
Insurance type shows no link to PAH treatment intensity, but financial assistance predicts more intensive therapy.
Why the study?
PAH medications are costly and often subject to insurance-related restrictions, but the impact of insurance type on PAH treatment had not been previously studied.
Does insurance type affect PAH medication use, time to initiation of combination therapy, and clinical outcomes in adult patients with incident pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Cohort (n=1,219)
Yes
Does insurance type affect PAH medication use, time to initiation of combination therapy, and clinical outcomes in adult patients with incident pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Effect estimate: OR 1.15 (95% CI 0.82-1.62)
Among patients treated at accredited pulmonary hypertension centers, insurance type did not significantly impact PAH treatment intensity or clinical outcomes, although the use of financial assistance programs was associated with earlier and more intensive therapy.
Rationale Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) medications are costly for patients and often subject to insurance-related restrictions that may limit access. The impact of insurance type on PAH treatment has not been studied previously. Objectives To examine whether insurance type is associated with PAH medication use, time to initiation of combination therapy, and clinical outcomes. Methods We studied a prospective cohort of incident adult patients with PAH enrolled in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry from 2015 to 2025. Insurance type was categorized as private insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid or similar public programs. We evaluated associations between insurance type and PAH medication regimen at the first follow-up visit, time to initiation of combination therapy, emergency department visit and hospitalization rates, and health-related quality of life outcomes using ordinal and logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazard models, as appropriate. Results The study cohort included 1,219 patients, of whom 40.0% had private insurance, 36.8% Medicare, and 23.2% Medicaid or similar programs. After multivariable adjustment, insurance type was not associated with treatment intensity (compared to Medicare, private insurance: OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.82-1.62; Medicaid: OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.84-1.96). Insurance was also not associated with time to initiation of combination therapy, hospitalization rates, or health-related quality of life. Use of financial assistance programs (non-profit or pharmaceutical company-sponsored) to pay for PAH medications was associated with higher odds of receiving more intensive medication therapy (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.29-2.23) and earlier initiation of combination therapy (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.16-2.04). Conclusions In this multicenter cohort of patients treated at accredited pulmonary hypertension centers, patients received similar PAH treatment and had comparable outcomes regardless of insurance type or income. PAH medication assistance program use was associated with earlier combination therapy and more intensive treatment. Primary Source of Funding National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32 GM075766 [B.E.M.]) and the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL173533 [N.A.-N.]).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCarthy et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=1,219). Insurance type (private, Medicare, Medicaid) and financial assistance programs vs. Medicare was evaluated on PAH medication regimen at the first follow-up visit (treatment intensity) (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.82-1.62). Insurance type was not associated with PAH treatment intensity (private vs Medicare OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.82-1.62), but financial assistance program use was associated with more intensive therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: