Case report reveals non-metastatic schwannoma mimicking nodal disease in cervical cancer, suggesting careful imaging importance.
Background: In oncologic patients, hypermetabolic neck lesions identified on F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are often assumed to indicate nodal metastasis, especially in advanced disease. However, benign tumors such as schwannomas can also demonstrate avid F-18 FDG uptake, potentially leading to false-positive nodal staging and unwarranted assumptions of metastatic disease. Case Presentation: An 85-year-old woman with advanced uterine cervical cancer (FIGO stage IIB) underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT for staging purposes. Alongside intense uptake in the primary tumor, a hypermetabolic mass was incidentally identified in the left neck, raising concerns about nodal metastasis. Further imaging, including MRI and high-resolution ultrasonography (US), suggested a non-nodal origin, and US-guided core needle biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of a schwannoma, with histopathologic examination demonstrating characteristic Antoni A and B areas with diffuse S-100 positivity. Because the patient was elderly and repeatedly declined aggressive treatment, management was ultimately limited to symptom-directed palliative radiotherapy. Although tissue confirmation did not directly alter the delivered treatment strategy, it clarified the staging and prevented the neck lesion from being misclassified as metastatic disease. Conclusions: This case underscores that not all hypermetabolic neck lesions detected on F-18 FDG PET/CT in oncologic patients indicate metastatic lymphadenopathy. A multimodal imaging approach combined with minimally invasive tissue sampling can provide critical diagnostic clarification, particularly when PET/CT findings might otherwise lead to unsupported nodal upstaging or misguided assumptions in treatment planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: