Multicenter cohort study evaluates winter temperature's role in long-term mortality after CABG, indicating important risk factors.
Background: Traditional cardiovascular risk models focus on patient-related clinical variables, while the impact of long-term environmental exposure remains insufficiently characterized in post-revascularization populations. Objective: To evaluate the association between environmental exposure and long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and to determine whether integrated environmental measures provide additional prognostic value beyond established clinical risk factors. Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 1042 consecutive patients undergoing CABG with a median follow-up of 8.1 years. Regional environmental data were linked to individual patients. Multivariable Cox regression models were constructed using a hierarchical approach. To address collinearity among environmental variables, principal component analysis (PCA) was applied. Mean winter temperature was analyzed as a clinically interpretable proxy of overall environmental exposure. Results: During follow-up, 220 deaths (21.1%) occurred. Established clinical predictors of mortality included age, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and dyslipidemia. Individual environmental variables showed unstable associations due to collinearity. PCA identified a dominant environmental component explaining 82.0% of variance; however, its association with mortality did not reach statistical significance after adjustment (HR 1.17 per SD, 95% CI 0.98–1.39; p = 0.083). In contrast, higher mean winter temperature was independently associated with increased mortality (HR 1.24 per SD, 95% CI 1.05–1.48; p = 0.013) per 1 °C increase, with evidence of non-linearity. Conclusions: Environmental exposure represents a relevant component of long-term risk after CABG. While individual environmental variables are highly correlated and unstable, clinically interpretable measures such as winter temperature may provide practical support for risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urbanowicz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: