Evaluates anti-HIV potential of six medicinal plants, suggesting effective natural treatments.
Background: Medicinal plants have been traditionally used for managing infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS. However, systematic evaluation of their anti-HIV potential using integrated computational approaches remains limited. Objective: This study evaluated the anti-HIV potential of six medicinal plants (Curcuma longa, Phyllanthusniruri, Andrographispaniculata, Ocimum sanctum, Withaniasomnifera, and Tinospora cordifolia) using phytochemical profiling, molecular docking, and ADMET analysis. Methods: Phytochemical constituents were identified using HPLC-DAD, GC-MS, and NMR spectroscopy. Molecular docking was performed against HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT), protease (PR), integrase (IN), and gp120 envelope protein using AutoDockVina. ADMET properties were predicted using SwissADME and pkCSM platforms. Results: HPLC-DAD quantification revealed curcumin at 28.5 ± 1.2 mg/g in C. longa, andrographolide at 15.6 ± 0.9 mg/g in A. paniculata, and berberine at 6.8 ± 0.5 mg/g in T. cordifolia. GC-MS analysis showed terpenoids as the most abundant constituents (30-45%). Curcumin demonstrated the highest binding affinity (-11.5 kcal/mol against RT), forming four hydrogen bonds with key active site residues. Ursolic acid showed strong protease inhibition (-10.8 kcal/mol). Quercetin exhibited multi-target activity against IN (-10.2 kcal/mol) and RT (-9.5 kcal/mol). Berberine showed moderate RT binding (-9.3 kcal/mol) with favorable BBB permeability. Andrographolide demonstrated binding to gp120 (-8.5 kcal/mol). ADMET analysis revealed low toxicity for all compounds. Conclusion: Curcumin emerged as the best overall anti-HIV candidate, followed by quercetin (multi-target inhibitor), ursolic acid (protease inhibitor), berberine (CNS-active compound), and andrographolide (entry inhibitor). These findings support further in vitro and in vivo validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AfsanaKhatoon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: