Why the study?
Do internet-based interventions on home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs modify risk behavior for myocardial infarction survivors in the long run?
Do internet-based interventions on home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs modify risk behavior for myocardial infarction survivors in the long run?
This literature review aims to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of internet-based interventions in sustaining health behaviors among myocardial infarction survivors undergoing home-based cardiac rehabilitation.
Long-term efficacy of internet-based home cardiac rehab remains uncertain; leaves open routine adoption for sustaining behaviors in MI survivors.
Cardiac rehabilitation program which includes exercise training, nutritional advice, psychosocial and risk factors counseling is traditionally applied for myocardial infarction survivor. However, the low participation rate [1] of cardiac rehabilitation has been reported globally. Recently home-based cardiac rehabilitation program is developed as an alternative approach [2][3][4] to overcome the challenges of low referral rate, inaccessibility of program site, and optimize the utilization of the program. Unfortunately, client may not be able to sustain the modified health behavior in their daily life after the completion of the cardiac rehabilitation programme. To date, the internet-based cardiac rehabilitation program has showed significant in improving the cardiovascular risk factors at the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program. [5][6][7][8] However, there are limited studies to review the significant of internet- based interventions of home- based cardiac rehabilitation in sustention of health behavior in long term. This review will fill the knowledge gap of how the internet-based interventions on home-based cardiac rehabilitation program modify the risk behavior for myocardial infarction survivor in the long run.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choy et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: