Why the study?
Fragmented QRS (fQRS) might serve as an additional diagnostic sign, prompting assessment of its diagnostic yield in patients with suspected acute myocarditis presenting to the emergency department.
Does the presence of fragmented QRS (fQRS) on ECG aid in the early diagnosis of acute myocarditis in patients presenting to the emergency department?
Does the presence of fragmented QRS (fQRS) on ECG aid in the early diagnosis of acute myocarditis in patients presenting to the emergency department?
Fragmented QRS is a frequent ECG finding in acute myocarditis that closely correlates with the anatomical distribution of myocardial injury on CMR, making it a useful bedside diagnostic tool.
fQRS may aid early suspicion of acute myocarditis at bedside; observational data leaves open prospective validation against CMR.
The diagnosis of acute myocarditis (AM) is based on a multi-parametric assessment including clinical presentation, ECG, imaging and biomarkers. Fragmented QRS (fQRS) might be an additional diagnostic sign in patients with proven AM. The main objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield of fQRS in patients with suspected AM presenting to the emergency department (ED). Patients admitted between January 2016 and March 2021 with a proven diagnosis of AM, according to clinical, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and/or histologic criteria, were included in the analysis. In total, 51 patients were analyzed (41 men, 78%), with a median age of 36 (29-45) years. Thirty-three (65%) patients had prodromal flu-like symptoms. Patients presented to the ED mostly complaining of chest pain (68%) and palpitations (21%). Seven (14%) patients experienced cardiac arrest, one of whom died. At presentation, 40 patients (78%) displayed fQRS, and 10 (20%) presented ventricular arrhythmias. All the surviving patients underwent CMR and displayed late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). ECG leads showed that fQRS matched the LGE distribution in 38 patients (95%). The presence of fQRS is a simple clinical bedside tool to support the initial suspect of AM in the emergency department and to guide the most appropriate clinical workup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piazza et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: