Why the study?
The study was conducted to determine whether cardiovascular health, assessed by resting blood pressure and heart rate, is affected by exercise type and associated impact.
Does high impact exercise (tennis) compared to low impact exercise (golf) improve resting blood pressure and heart rate in adults aged 40 to 71 years?
Does high impact exercise (tennis) compared to low impact exercise (golf) improve resting blood pressure and heart rate in adults aged 40 to 71 years?
While overall resting blood pressure and heart rate did not differ between golfers and tennis players, high-impact exercise like tennis may protect against age-related increases in systolic blood pressure.
The principal aim of this study was to determine whether cardiovascular health, assessed by systolic and diastolic blood pressure and resting heart rate, was affected by exercise (golf vs. tennis) and associated impact (low vs. high). Male and female golfers (n = 40) tennis players (n = 40) aged between 40 and 71 years completed a short questionnaire to their main sport and typical exercise habits. Resting blood pressure and heart rate were then taken using an electronic wrist sphygmomanometer. The analysis of (General Linear Model) showed that overall there were no significant differences in the resting systolic or diastolic blood pressure, or resting heart rate, of golfers and players. However, a significant increase in systolic blood pressure with age (F = 10.48, p = 0.002) was observed in golfers, compared with no significant age-related in blood pressure in tennis players. In conclusion, exercise type and impact to have no effect on cardiovascular health in the 40 to 71 year olds age group, but impact exercise may have a protective effect against age-related increases in blood which requires further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarah Buckingham (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: