Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hapten sensitization through UV-exposed skin induces hapten-specific tolerance that can be adoptively transferred by injecting T lymphocytes into naive recipients. The exact phenotype of T cells responsible for inhibiting the immune response and their mode of action remain unclear. Evidence exists that CTLA-4 negatively regulates T cell activation. We addressed whether CTLA-4 is involved in the transfer of UV-induced tolerance. Injection of lymph node cells from mice that were sensitized with dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) through UV-irradiated skin inhibited induction of contact hypersensitivity against DNFB in the recipient animals. When CTLA-4+ cells were depleted, transfer of suppression was lost. Likewise, significantly fewer lymphocytes enriched for CTLA-4+ cells were necessary to transfer suppression than unfractionated cells. Expression of CTLA-4 appears to be functionally relevant, since in vivo injection of a blocking anti-CTLA-4 Ab was able to break UV-induced tolerance and inhibited transfer of suppression. Upon stimulation with dendritic cells in the presence of the water-soluble DNFB analogue, DNBS, CTLA-4+ T cells from DNFB-tolerized mice secreted high levels of IL-10, TGF-beta, and IFN-gamma; low levels of IL-2; and no IL-4, resembling the cytokine pattern of T regulatory 1 cells. Ab blocking of CTLA-4 resulted in inhibition of IL-10 release. Accordingly, transfer of tolerance was not observed when recipients were treated with an anti-IL-10 Ab. Hence we propose that T cells, possibly of the T regulatory 1 type, transfer UV-mediated suppression through the release of IL-10. Activation of CTLA-4 appears to be important in this process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwarz et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: