Why the study?
Anthracyclines cause potentially life-threatening adverse events, but the comparative efficacy of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide versus anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy in early HER2-negative breast cancer remained unclear.
Does adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) improve disease-free survival, overall survival, and cardiotoxicity compared to anthracycline-taxane in women with stages I-III, HER2-negative breast cancer?
Does adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) improve disease-free survival, overall survival, and cardiotoxicity compared to anthracycline-taxane in women with stages I-III, HER2-negative breast cancer?
Adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) shows no significant difference in disease-free survival, overall survival, or cardiotoxicity compared to anthracycline-taxane in early HER2-negative breast cancer, though anthracycline-taxane may benefit those with ≥4 positive nodes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports TC as equivalent alternative to anthracycline-taxane; confirms regimen flexibility without survival or safety trade-offs in early HER2-negative breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: Anthracycline-taxane is the standard chemotherapy strategy for treating high-risk early breast cancer despite the potentially life-threatening adverse events caused by anthracyclines. Commonly, the combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) is considered an alternative option. However, the efficacy of TC compared to anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy is unclear. This study compares disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cardiotoxicity between adjuvant TC and anthracycline-taxane for stages I-III, HER2-negative breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic search on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized-controlled trials published until 11 March 2024, yielded 203 studies with 11,803 patients, and seven trials were included. RESULTS: TC results in little to no difference in DFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98-1.20; moderate-certainty of evidence); OS (1.02, 95% CI 0.89-1.16; high-certainty of evidence); and cardiotoxicity (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.16-1.76; high-certainty of evidence), compared to anthracycline-taxane. In the subgroup analysis, patients with ≥4 lymph nodes had improved DFS from anthracycline-taxane over TC. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was no difference between TC and anthracycline-taxane in DFS, OS and cardiotoxicity. In women with ≥4 nodes, anthracycline-taxane was associated with a substantial reduction in relapse events, compared to TC. Our study supports the current standard of practice, which is to use anthracycline-taxane and TC chemotherapy as a reasonable option in select cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mata et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: