The goal of concurrent mapping and localization (CML) is for a mobile robot to build a map of an unknown environment while simultaneously using that map to navigate. CML can be considered as a problem of multiple target tracking (MTT) in the presence of navigation uncertainty. Although data association errors can have a catastrophic e ect on CML performance, previous approaches to CML, such as stochastic mapping (SM), have either ignored the data association problem, matched features by hand, or used a nearest-neighbor approach [4, 2]. We have developed Integrated Mapping and Navigation (IMAN), a multiple hypothesis approach to CML that generalizes SM to incorporate data association uncertainty and expands multiple hypothesis tracking (MHT) to
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: