Why the study?
Does cardiovascular function and aerobic fitness differ between premenarcheal girls and young adult women when adjusted for body size using allometric scaling?
Does cardiovascular function and aerobic fitness differ between premenarcheal girls and young adult women when adjusted for body size using allometric scaling?
Allometric scaling eliminates the apparent decline in VO2max between premenarcheal girls and young adult women, indicating that body dimension differences account for variations in aerobic fitness and that cardiac functional reserve is similar.
Allometric scaling needed for valid VO2max comparisons in females; leaves open whether maturation affects cardiac reserve.
Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in females, expressed as ml x kg(-1) x min(-1), declines steadily during the first three decades of life. The contribution of diminished cardiovascular function to this apparent fall in aerobic fitness is unknown. Cardiac responses to maximal cycle exercise were compared in 24 premenarcheal females (mean age 11.7 years) and 17 young adult women (mean age 27.4 years) using Doppler echocardiography. Mean VO2max was 40 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1) and 34.7 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1) in the girls and women, respectively (p < 0.05). When VO2max was expressed relative to allometrically-derived mass(0.52), however, no significant difference was observed in aerobic fitness between the two groups. Similar allometric analyses revealed no significant differences in average maximal cardiac output (10.50 vs 10.07 L x min(-1) BSA(-1.11) for girls and women, respectively) nor maximal stroke volume (53 vs 56 ml BSA(-1.13) respectively). These findings suggest that 1) allometric scaling is important in eliminating the effects of body size on VO2max, 2) body dimension differences can account for variations in VO2 in young females, and 3) cardiac functional reserve is similar in premenarcheal girls and young adult women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rowland et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: