This article examines two attempts to racialize criticality in adult education from an African American perspective. The first framework is second-generation critical theory, in which African American intellectuals reframe criticality as the awareness of a need for struggle against systemic racism. The second framework, Africentrism, proposes to reconceptualize criticality as an alternative discourse rooted in a distinctive Africentric epistemology. Each framework offers implications for adult education curricula and instruction. Questions about whether these positions are compatible or can be integrated remain open to debate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen Brookfield (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: