Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
N-gram language modeling typically requires large quantities of in-domain training data, i.e., data that matches the task in both topic and style. For conversational speech applications, particularly meeting transcription, obtaining large volumes of speech transcripts is often unrealistic; topics change frequently and collecting conversational-style training data is time-consuming and expensive. In particular, new topics introduce new vocabulary items which are not included in existing models. In this work, we use a variety of data sources (reflecting different sizes and styles), combined using mixture n-gram models. We study the impact of the different sources on vocabulary expansion and recognition accuracy, and investigate possible indicators of the usefulness of a data source. For the task of recognizing meeting speech, we obtain a 9% relative reduction in the overall word error rate and a 61% relative reduction in the word error rate for "new" words added to the vocabulary over a baseline language model trained from general conversational speech data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwarm et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: